Robert Scot made Jeffersons Personal Lost Seal

Thomas Jeffersons lost seal <<< Open the link!

This document shows the only known Wax Seal impression that shows Scots makers marks. The document covers the President of William & Mary collage paying Scot for his services with making the collage seals. The evidence is very significant for the great seal evidence that Scot made the great seals. Except this have been proven by my research, many times over. This is an introduction to the Indian peace medals that I am working on right now. Here we also find Joseph Wright the famous Painters makers marks on the snake tail. Who worked under Robert Scots guild umbrella. (JJW)

Origins of the US Dollar Being Called A Buck!

Recent evidence that proves the origins of the US dollar being called a “BUCK” originates to the Scot’s Buccleuch family badge design. Robert Scot the great seal maker, made all the first US Bank of the United States first bank notes. Scot and a student, transformed the on the earliest bank notes, the eagle design. When you click on the green hyper link below, you can see the birds and the arrows is a “Buck” or the family badge! Scot could manipulate any design he wanted because he was a presentative of the families of Scotland behind the creation of the United States infrastructure. George Washington cut down a cheery tree, think again! The founding fathers were under the thumbs of the Scottish families who America belonged too.

Scott- Coat of Arms Stag

BELOW IS THE KNOWN HISTORY OF “WHY IS A DOLLAR CALLED A BUCK”.

As with many etymologies, the exact root of this word is difficult to say with one hundred percent certainty. However, the leading theory is extremely plausible and backed up by a fair bit of documented evidence. Specifically, it is thought that a dollar is called a “buck” thanks to deer.

One of the earliest references of this was in 1748, about 44 years before the first U.S. dollar was minted, where there is a reference to the exchange rate for a cask of whiskey traded to Native Americans being “5 bucks”, referring to deerskins.

In yet another documented reference from 1748, Conrad Weiser, while traveling through present day Ohio, noted in his journal that someone had been “robbed of the value of 300 Bucks.”

At this time, a buck skin was a common medium of exchange. There is also evidence that a “buck” didn’t simply mean one deerskin, but may have meant multiple skins, depending on quality. For instance, skins from deer killed in the winter were considered superior to those killed in the summer, due to the fur being thicker.

It is thought that the highest quality skins were generally assigned a one to one value with one skin equaling one buck. In contrast, for lower quality skins, it might take several of them to be valued at a single buck. The specific value for given sets of skins was then set at trading.

In addition, when the skin was from another animal, the number of skins required to equal a buck varied based on the animal and the quality of the skins. For instance, there is one documented trade where six high quality beaver skins or twelve high quality rabbit pelts each equaled one buck.

This use of skins as a medium of exchange gradually died off over the next century as more and more Europeans moved in and built towns and cities. Once the U.S. dollar was officially introduced after the passing of the Coinage Act of 1792, it quickly became the leading item used as a medium of exchange, but the term “buck” stuck around and by the mid-nineteenth century was being used as a slang term for the dollar.

Hello world!

This blog has been started to allow readers to see my most recent historical relic discoveries. Here you will have an opportunity to see how I use the study of hidden markers marks and symbolism to advance the provenance on relics. This allows specific relics to be identified to the names of the artist and to the near exact date in time the relic was made. You the reader have an opportunity to explore how, 18th century art guilds preserved forms or ancient writing that date back to on the oldest known form of writing cut in stone that dates back to 4500 years.